Research

My research is driven by questions about how our cognitive structures and the social world interact. I am especially interested in in evidence-resistance and the dynamics of belief revision, in particular in social and political contexts. You can read more about general themes in my research in this (somewhat outdated) interview. My PhilPeople page links directly to all my published papers (both published versions and PDFs of penultimate drafts).

The papers below cover a range of topics. Here are major thematic clusters:

  • Evidence-responsiveness, evidence-resistance, and belief: In “Resistant beliefs, responsive believers” (Journal of Philosophy, in press) and “Why think that belief is evidence-responsive?” (What is Belief?, OUP, in press), I offer new arguments for the claim that, if you believe something, then you have the capacity to change that attitude in the light of evidence. A central focus is accounting for the obvious fact that it’s often very hard to change people’s minds. In “Epistemic norms on evidence-gathering” (co-authored with Elise Woodard, Philosophical Studies, 2023), we discuss the epistemology of one major source of evidence-resistance, namely, failures to gather relevant evidence.

  • Epistemic styles: In “Epistemic styles” (Philosophical Topics, 2021), I introduce the notion of epistemic styles to account for divergences in how agents interact with evidence. In a work-in-progress paper, I argue that time spent on social media inculcates distinctive epistemic styles, as opposed to only changing the evidence we have (the focus of public discussions of misinformation).

  • Neurodiversity and interactions with evidence in psychiatric contexts: I have a series of papers applying the theoretical work above to psychiatric contexts - often taken to be limit cases of irrational or non-standard interactions with evidence. In “Delusional evidence-responsiveness” (Synthese, 2021), I argue that delusions are responsive to evidence, and therefore can count as beliefs. In “Delusion and evidence” (Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy of Delusion, in press), I describe how delusions relate to evidence, focusing on similarities with ordinary cases. In “Epistemic style in OCD” (a short commentary, Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychiatry, 2023)), I suggest the notion may be useful to explain inquiry and reasoning in OCD. In a paper under review, I suggest that delusion-supporting reasoning in schizophrenia constitutes an epistemic style, and argue that this makes it substantially intelligible.

  • Identity labels and essentialism: In “‘That’s all you really are’”, Liz Camp and I offer a characterization of what is involved in centering social identities in thought and interaction, offering an alternative to models that assume agents have essentialist beliefs in such cases and detailing implications for addressing such behavior. In “Playing with labels”, we consider one mechanism involved in centering social identities - identity labels -, examine their cognitive and social role, and then focus on the distinctive profile of playful uses of such labels. (This paper has the most entertaining examples of all my papers.)

    For what it’s worth, the articles I am proudest of are: “Resistant beliefs, responsive believers”; “Epistemic styles”; and “Playing with labels”.

Publications

Work in progress

Some Recent and Upcoming Talks

  • University of Utah Philosophy Department Colloquium, Salt Lake City, USA, Fall 2024 TBD

  • Meeting of the Portuguese Society for Analytic Philosophy, Lisbon, Portugal, 10-12 July 2024

  • Episteme Workshop, Rhodes, Greece, 4-5 July 2024

  • Logos Seminar, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 31 May 2024

  • Princeton Political Epistemology Workshop, Princeton, USA, 6 April 2024